Bibliography

• Bach, M. ‘The Last Frontier in Diversity and Inclusion: Ability Diversity’. Lifespeak. Available at https://www.lifespeak.com/resource/the-last-frontier-in-diversity-and-inclusion-ability-diversity/
• Banks, S. Ethics and Social Welfare, 10 (1) 2016, pp. 35-52
• Berger, J. Ways of Seeing, Penguin 1972, p.7
• Bell, J. & Waters, S. (2014). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers. 6th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
• BERA (2018) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research.
• British Educational Research Association (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4th ed. Available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
• Bradbury, H. (ed.) (2015). The SAGE handbook of action research [electronic resource]. Los Angeles: SAGE. Available at: https://methods-sagepub-com.arts.idm.oclc.org/book/the-SAGE-handbook-of-action-research-3e .
• Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: a practical guide to understanding and doing. London: Sage. Available at: https://study.sagepub.com/thematicanalysis .
• Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D. & Maguire, P. (2003). ‘Why Action Research?’. Action Research, 1(1), pp. 9-28.
• Cahill, C., Sultana, F. & Pain R. (2007). ‘Participatory ethics: Politics, practices, institutions’. ACME, 6(3), 2007.
• Clift, S., Hancox, G., Morrison, I., Hess, B., Kreutz, G., Stewart, D., (2010). ‘Choral singing and psychological wellbeing: Quantitative and qualitative findings from English choirs in a cross-national survey’. Journal of Applied Arts and Health, 1(1).
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2012). ‘Chapter 12: Sampling’ in Research Methods in Education. Routledge: London.
• Converse, J. M. & Presser, S. (2011). Survey questions: handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. London: Sage.
• Cook, T. (2009). ‘The purpose of mess in action research: building rigour though a messy turn’. Educational Action Research, 17(2). pp. 277-291.
• Costello, P. (2003). Action Research. London: Continuum Books.
• Ellis, C. S. & Bochner, A. P. (2006). ‘Analyzing Analytic Autoethnography: An Autopsy’. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), pp. 429-449.
• Florence, N. (1998). ‘A critical analysis of bell hooks’ engaged pedagogy: A transgressive education for the development of critical consciousness’. ETD Collection for Fordham University. [dissertation].
• Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30th Anniversary Ed. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group. 
• Gilson, S. F., & Depoy, E. (2000). ‘Multiculturalism and Disability: A critical perspective’. Disability & Society, 15(2), pp. 207-218. 
• Gouzouasis, P. ‘A/r/tographic Inquiry in a New Tonality The Relationality of Music and Poetry‘, Handbook of Arts-Based Research, ed. Leavy, P. Guilford Publications, 2017
• Gray, C. & Malins, J. (2004). Visualizing Research: A guide to the research process in art and design. Farnham: Ashgate.
• Gutiérrez, J. (2016). ‘Participatory Action Research (PAR) and the Colombian Peasant Reserve Zones: The Legacy of Orlando Fals Borda’. Policy and Practice: A Development Education Review, Vol. 22, Spring. pp. 59-76. 
• Kara, H. (2015). Creative Research Methods in the Social Sciences: A practical guide. Bristol: Policy Press.
• Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (2007). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. London: Sage.
• Korsgaard, M. T. (2018). ‘Education and the concept of commons. A pedagogical reinterpretation’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(4). pp. 445-455.
• Koshy, E., Koshy, V., & Waterman, H. (2010). Action Research In Healthcare. London: SAGE Publishing.
• LaBelle, B. (2018). Sonic Agency: Sound and Emergent Forms of Resistance. London: Goldsmiths Press.
• Leavy, P. Research Design : Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches,
• Guilford Publications, 2017
• Lenette, C. (2023). Participatory Action Research: Ethics and Decolonization. Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Liberating Structures, Wise Crowds, (https://www.liberatingstructures.com/13-wise-crowds/#:~:text=Including%20and%20Unleashing%20Everyone,Martin%20Buber).
• Light, A., Mason, D., Wakeford, T., Wolstenholme, R, & Hielscher, S. (2018). ‘Creative Practice and Transformations to Sustainability: Making and Managing Culture Change’. 10.13140/RG.2.2.10760.88321. 
• Lundy, L. (2007), ‘Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child’. British Educational Research Journal, 33. pp. 927-942.
• McAteer, M. (2013). Action Research in Education. London: Sage.
• McIntyre, A. (2007). Participatory Action Research. London: Sage.
• McNiff, J. (2002). ‘Action Research for Professional Development’. 3rd ed. [electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.jeanmcniff.com/ar-booklet.asp .
• Moreno-Romero, C., Enn, Ü., Savvani, S., & Pantazis, A. (2024). ‘Educational commons facilitating student voice: an ethnographic approach’. Education 3-13, 52(6). pp. 891-910.
• Pew Research Center (2021). Writing Survey Questions. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/our-methods/u-s-surveys/writing-survey-questions/ .
• Renel, W. (2019). Sonic Inclusion. [PhD thesis, Royal College of Art].
• Santos, B. de Sousa (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Abingdon: Routledge.
• Stevens, J., Butterfield, C., Whittington, A. & Holttum, S. (2018). ‘Evaluation of Arts based Courses within a UK Recovery College for People with Mental Health Challenges’. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6).
• Spinuzzi, C. (2005). ‘The Methodology of Participatory Design’. Technical Communication, 52(2). pp. 163-174.
• Thompson, P. (2021) Patter blog. Available at: https://patthomson.net/category/literature-review/ .
• UAL Code of Practice for Educational Ethics 2022. https://kimnoce.myblog.arts.ac.uk/files/2024/01/UAL-Code-of-Practice-on-Educational-Ethics-Word-43KB.docx#:~:text=The%20four%20guiding%20principles%20of,of%20student%20relationships%20and%20activities.
• University of Sheffield, Specialist Research Ethics Guidance Paper on ‘Emotionally Demanding Research: Risks to the Researcher’: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.834056!/file/SREGPEmotionallyDemandingResearch.pdf.
• University of St Andrews, Trauma-informed research and distress, https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/research/integrity-ethics/humans/ethical-guidance/distress-/
• Vang, M., Wolfgram, M., Smolarek, B., Lee, L., Moua, P., Thao, A., Xiong, O., Xiong, K., Xiong, Y., & Yang, L. (2023). ‘Autoethnographic engagement in participatory action research: Bearing witness to developmental transformations for college student activists’. Action Research, 21(1).
• Vogelin, S. (2022). ‘Sonic Senses: The Meaning of the Invisible’. In Matthew, J., Prior, D. & Grant, J (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Sound Art. Oxford: OUP.
• Willis, J. & Edwards, C. (2014). Action Research: Models, Methods, and Examples. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
• Wilson, B. (2020). ‘Disorientation as a Learning Objective: Applying Transformational Learning Theory in Participatory Action Pedagogy’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 44(2). London: Sage.
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell.